Poaphilini-genera spp.

Moth Taxon Search
Poaphilini-genera spp.
Notes (optional)
SS: Parallelia rigidistria (Guenée, 1852)
Ophiusa rigidistria Guenée, 1852 in Boisduval & Guenée, Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Species général des Lépidoptéres 7: 240 (Ophiusa) (holotype: female, Central India, NHM (BMNH), London).
MOT Vol. 3, Part 2, Pl. 15/13. As Parallelia rigidistria.
FBI, Hampson, Vol. 2, Pg. 496, # 2488 as Ophiusa rigidistria. WS: 56 mm. Sylhet, Rangoon, Sri Lanka.
Sivasankaran, K. and Ignacimuthu, S., 2014. A report of Erebidae (Lepidoptera: noctuoidea) from the Tamil Nadu part of the Western Ghats, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 111(3), pp.193-209.
Holloway, J.D. and Miller, S.E., 2003. The composition, generic placement and host-plant relationships of the joviana-group in the Parallelia generic complex (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Catocalinae). Invertebrate Systematics, 17(1), pp.111-128. Places this as ‘Parallelia’ rigidistria (Guenée, 1852).
Sondhi, S., Y. Sondhi, T. Karmakar & K. Kunte. 2021. Moth diversity (Lepidoptera) of Shendurney and Ponmudi in Agastyamalai Biosphere Reserve, Kerala, India: an update. Tropical Lepidoptera Research 31(3): 166-178. Pg. 170, Pl. 2/23.
Sondhi, S. (2024). Moths of India - A Field Guide. Published by Titli Trust. xii+280 pp. Pl. 83/75 as Dysgonia rigidistria.
Sorry, gave wrong id should be Parallelia rigidistria https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/187255150
JD : Is the diffused medial band the only way to distinguish from P. calefaciens? Bold Systems has specimens with non-diffused bands for rigidistria - http://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=455735. If on location, MOI has spoecimens from S. India identified as calefaciens.

GI: Bold System sometimes have wrong ids and so are not always a completely dependable source. I recall looking at the hw features also while identifying P calefaciens from KMTR. Unfortunately we don't have the HW features here . But they are seen in Sanjay's book image and in Lepidoptera of Ceylon vol 3-plate 168 fig 3. The image further confirms that the diffused medial band is the way to distinguish this one from P calefaciens. Hind wing details are also slightly ( not so drastically )different from calefaciens
Therefore I agree with the ID for the present. If we get more images in the future with hindwing details, we can revisit the species and correct them.