Moth Taxon Search
Observation_272267
Notes (optional)
Hadennia incongruens (Butler, 1879)
Bocana incongruens (Butler, 1879). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 4: 448. TL: Japan, Yokohama. Text at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25160023#page/462/mode/1up
MOT Vol. 3, Part 2, Pg. 22, Pl. 1/38.
Nodaria ? amurensis Staudinger, 1888; 274; TL: Vladivostok; Askold; Suifun; Ussuri.
Owada, M., 1992. Synonymic notes on the herminiine moths (Noctuidae) of Japan, with descriptions of three new species. Tinea, 13(15~ 20), pp.p183-203.
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1071462-Hadennia-incongruens
Very good match to OD and plate in MOT; not such good match to images on iNat.
Hampson, FBI, Vol. 3, pg 45 lists incongruens as a synonym of jutalis, but Owada (1992) listed incongruens as a good species and MOT includes India in its distribution.
JD : The OD is not very descriptive and coulld be applied for many other Hadennia spp. The images of incongruens on iNat, in Tinea and other websites clearly have an irregular distal edge to the dark post-medial band. This is not evident here. Hence I do not think that this is incongruens
Bocana incongruens (Butler, 1879). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 4: 448. TL: Japan, Yokohama. Text at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25160023#page/462/mode/1up
MOT Vol. 3, Part 2, Pg. 22, Pl. 1/38.
Nodaria ? amurensis Staudinger, 1888; 274; TL: Vladivostok; Askold; Suifun; Ussuri.
Owada, M., 1992. Synonymic notes on the herminiine moths (Noctuidae) of Japan, with descriptions of three new species. Tinea, 13(15~ 20), pp.p183-203.
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1071462-Hadennia-incongruens
Very good match to OD and plate in MOT; not such good match to images on iNat.
Hampson, FBI, Vol. 3, pg 45 lists incongruens as a synonym of jutalis, but Owada (1992) listed incongruens as a good species and MOT includes India in its distribution.
JD : The OD is not very descriptive and coulld be applied for many other Hadennia spp. The images of incongruens on iNat, in Tinea and other websites clearly have an irregular distal edge to the dark post-medial band. This is not evident here. Hence I do not think that this is incongruens
Observation Reference