Nolinae-genera spp.

JD : This is possibly Meganola major (Hampson, 1891) ssp major - Illustrated Typical Specimens of the Lepidoptera Heterocera in the Collection of the British Museum 8: 4, 48, pl. 139, fig. 13
https://archive.org/details/illustrationsoft08brituoft/page/48/mode/1up?view=theater
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/75388#page/155/mode/1up
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/886365-Meganola-major
MON Vol 5 Pl 140/26
A taxonomic and zoogeographical survey of the Meganola Dyar, 1898 generic complex based on the Palaearctic and Oriental species, László Gyula - pg 37 & Pl 2 Fig 10
SS: Manoba phaeochroa (Hampson, 1900)
SS: I have struggled to reliably separate Manoba phaeochroa (Hampson, 1900) and Meganola major (Hampson, 1891). However, this individual does not look like Meganola major as it lacks the black triangular spot at base of forewing. Uploading what is possibly Meganola major separately.
Celama phaeochroa Hampson, 1900; Cat. Lep. Phalaenae Br. Mus. 2: 29, pl. 18, f. 24; TL: Sikkim, 7000ft. Text as https://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid2brituoft/page/29/mode/1up?view=theater. Plate at https://archive.org/details/catalogueoflepid13brit/page/n96/mode/2up?view=theater
MON, Part 5, Pl. 140/19.

RS: Yes, I also agree that this is not Meganola major (after seeing the new uploads). The forewing shape and mark at the base is different and does not resemble the characteristic Meganola/Nola shape.
Can be uploaded as Celama phaeochroa.
SS: This does not look like Manoba phaeochroa (Hampson, 1900) either. I am uploading this as Nolinae-genera-spp.